Flow Control Techniques: Investigating Methods to Manipulate Airflow Around Aircraft Surfaces for Improved Performance

Abstract

The methods of flow control are crucial in the improvement of aircraft performance through the control of airflow on surfaces of aircraft thus leading to an increase in efficient use of air, decrease of drag and increase in lift. The present research focuses on several interventions in airflow control and classifies them into passive control, aggressive control, and combined control systems. Operations like the employment of vortex generators, boundary layer fences, and riblets are passive since they do not require energy input. These methods involve installing fixed devices to change the flow characteristics, defer the formation of flow separating, and minimize the drag, thus ideal for a particular flight condition, high lift. Real-time control methods such as synthetic jets and plasma actuators need energy supplied from external sources to control flow. Synthetic jets can produce repeated puffs of air to alter the boundary layer to avoid flow separation and minimize the drag. Plasma actuators, which ionize air, or create plasma, electrically, work faster and enable the control of flow separation and drag without mechanical parts. These active techniques give more certain and flexible control over the flight activity but they are complex and consume more power as compared to other techniques in response to changes in flights. It is worth noting that the hybrid flow control strategies use both passive and active flows to take the benefits of the two. For instance, using \'vortex generators\' combined with \'synthetic jets may enhance the boundary layer and offer maximum performance at various flight conditions (Li et al., 2022). This working synergy can be considered as the improvement of the aerodynamic performance thanks to the adaptability and efficiency improvement. The paper also describes the theoretical background, application, and performance assessment of the above-mentioned flow control methods. Thus, by comparing and analyzing the existing techniques the given paper will describe the state of Flow Control Technologies and state what further directions are possible to identify in the development of advanced technologies and their influence on the development and modification of Aerospace Engineering and Aircraft Designs.

Introduction

This research explores how flow control technologies—methods for managing airflow over aircraft surfaces—can significantly improve aerodynamic performance, fuel efficiency, maneuverability, and environmental impact in aviation. Both passive and active techniques, along with hybrid systems, are assessed for their potential benefits and practical challenges.

Key Objectives

1. Identify and compare various flow control strategies.

2. Analyze real-world applicability in flight conditions.

3. Examine the effectiveness, uses, and limitations of each technique.

4. Discuss current problems in implementation.

5. Explore future innovations in flow control.

Types of Flow Control Techniques

1. Passive Flow Control

• No external energy input required.

• Cost-effective and easy to integrate into aircraft design.

• Common examples:

  • Vortex Generators (VGs): Create small vortices to energize the boundary layer, delaying flow separation and increasing lift.

  • Boundary Layer Fences: Prevent lateral flow across the wing, improving stability.

  • Riblets: Tiny grooves aligned with airflow to reduce skin-friction drag (can reduce drag by up to 10%).

  • Turbulators & Trip Wires: Induce turbulence to delay boundary layer separation.

2. Active Flow Control

• Requires energy input to interact with airflow dynamically.

• Can adapt to changing flight conditions.

• Examples include:

  • Synthetic Jets: Use diaphragm oscillation to inject or remove momentum in the boundary layer, controlling flow separation.

  • Plasma Actuators: Use ionized gas and electric fields to influence airflow without moving parts.

  • Other Methods: Pulsed blowing, suction, and electromagnetic actuators.

3. Hybrid Flow Control

• Combines passive and active methods for superior performance.

• Examples:

  • VGs + Synthetic Jets: Enhance lift and reduce drag more than either method alone.

  • Riblets + Plasma Actuators: Combine drag reduction with dynamic flow control under variable flight conditions.

Methodology

• Literature Review: Assesses prior studies and categorizes passive, active, and hybrid techniques.

• CFD Simulations: Use tools like ANSYS Fluent or OpenFOAM to model airflow over aircraft surfaces and test different devices.

• Wind Tunnel Testing: Physical models fitted with flow control devices are tested in controlled conditions for real-world validation.

Experimental Setup

• Geometry & Mesh: Aircraft models are prepared with high-resolution meshes, especially around critical flow regions (e.g., leading/trailing edges).

• Boundary Conditions: Set for different flight scenarios using turbulence models like k-ω SST.

• Modeling Flow Devices: Simulate both passive (VGs, riblets) and active devices (synthetic jets, plasma actuators).

Data Collection & Analysis

• Key measurements: Lift, drag, pressure distributions, and streamline patterns.

• Comparisons are made between:

  • Passive vs Active systems

  • CFD simulations vs Wind Tunnel results

  • Hybrid vs individual flow control techniques

Key Findings

Effectiveness of Techniques

• Vortex Generators: Particularly effective during takeoff and landing at high angles of attack.

• Riblets: Reduce skin-friction drag, effective in cruise conditions.

• Synthetic Jets: Dynamic and useful for flow separation control.

• Plasma Actuators: Fast response with low power, promising for future applications.

• Hybrid Systems: Consistently outperform individual methods in both simulations and wind tunnel tests.

Challenges & Limitations

• Cost & Maintenance: Active systems are expensive and require frequent maintenance.

• Integration: Complex to retrofit into existing aircraft designs.

• Reliability: Active systems may compromise reliability if not well-managed.

• Environmental Considerations: Must reduce fuel use and emissions to align with sustainability goals.

Future Directions

• 3D Printing & Smart Materials: Improve device design and integration.

• Low-cost Actuators: Needed to make active systems more accessible.

• UAV Applications: Increasing relevance for drones and small aircraft.

• Interdisciplinary Research: Collaboration among aerodynamics, materials science, and control engineering.

Conclusion

Aerodynamics are a critical aspect that helps in enhancing the performance of aircraft and this is by controlling the flow of that air touching the surfaces of the aircraft thus achieving enhanced flight characteristics which include the controlling of drag and lift together with an improvement in flight efficiency. In this research paper, many approaches to flow control have been explained at length such that they are categorized into passive control, active control, and the combining of the two. Drawing such comparisons and assessments in detail, this paper has outlined the advantages and disadvantages of each one and provided information on the applicability and the prospect of their further evolution. There are over-the-wall devices like the vortex generators, boundary layer fences, and riblets which were used to delay the flow separation and reduce the drag without having to exert any additional energy. They are commonly employed in the designs of different aircraft classes because of their uncomplicated nature and high level of effectiveness. Junction and plasma are examples of flow control where the main control over the flow is exercised actively, therefore, the processes can be controlled during flight depending on the existing flight condition. Hence, even though some of the mentioned techniques require the application of extra energy, the openness of these methods and the intensiveness of their application toward improving the aerodynamic parameters notably affect modern aircraft technology. The next promising tendencies of the advancements in flow control methods relate to using so-called convert types of control where such passive and active types of flow control turn into one another. Because hybrid techniques combine several flow control techniques, the various combined techniques work better and can switch flow control issues, which is the voice of a specific technique. This interconnection of passive and active structures implies that it is easier to supervise and coordinate between the two systems and at the same time perform at optimum levels. The generation advancement for flow control technologies ensures the provision of efficiency safety and performance-enhancing growth of aircraft hence boosting aerospace engineering. Depending on time and with the increase in research there might be a better and more upgraded flow control system which in return enhances the designs and functions of airplanes even more. The findings of this research paper shall help in sustaining the processes of flow control innovation and improvement to advance aerospace technology and achieve greater aerodynamic performances, safety as well as the quality of aircraft.

References

[1] Adryan, F. A., & Sastra, K. W. (2021). Predictive maintenance for aircraft engine using machine learning: Trends and challenges. Avia, 3(1). [2] Akhter, M. Z., & Omar, F. K. (2021). Review of flow-control devices for wind-turbine performance enhancement. Energies, 14(5), 1268. [3] Amalberti, R., & Wioland, L. I. E. N. (2020). Human error in aviation. In Aviation safety, human factors-system engineering-flight operations-economics-strategies-management (pp. 91-108). CRC Press. [4] Ashill, P. R., & Fulker, J. L. (1993). Passive and Active Control of Separation on a NACA 0015 Aerofoil. AIAA Journal, 31(10), 2047-2053. [5] Barklage, A., Römer, U., Bertram, A., Bekemeyer, P., Himisch, J., Radespiel, R., & Badrya, C. (2022). Analysis and uncertainty quantification of a hybrid laminar flow control system. AIAA Journal, 60(10), 5735-5749. [6] Beck, N., Landa, T., Seitz, A., Boermans, L., Liu, Y., & Radespiel, R. (2018). Drag reduction by laminar flow control. Energies, 11(1), 252. [7] Bhattacharyya, S., Vishwakarma, D. K., Srinivasan, A., Soni, M. K., Goel, V., Sharifpur, M., ... & Meyer, J. (2022). Thermal performance enhancement in heat exchangers using active and passive techniques: a detailed review. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 147(17), 9229-9281. [8] Bhatti, M. M., Marin, M., Zeeshan, A., & Abdelsalam, S. I. (2020). Recent trends in computational fluid dynamics. Frontiers in Physics, 8, 593111. [9] Bieler, H. (2017). Active flow control concepts and application opportunities. Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology, 89(5), 725-729. [10] Cacciatori, L., Brignoli, C., Mele, B., Gattere, F., Monti, C., & Quadrio, M. (2022). Drag reduction by riblets on a commercial UAV. Applied Sciences, 12(10), 5070. [11] Coletti, C. T., & Faruque, I. (2022). Flight dynamics integration approach for aircraft using active flow control as primary control surfaces. In AIAA Scitech 2022 Forum (p. 0556). [12] Corke, T. C., Enloe, C. L., & Wilkinson, S. P. (2010). Dielectric Barrier Discharge Plasma Actuators for Flow Control. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 42, 505-529. [13] DeSalvo, M., Whalen, E., & Glezer, A. (2020). High-lift performance enhancement using active flow control. AIAA Journal, 58(10), 4228-4242. [14] Ghraieb, H., Viquerat, J., Larcher, A., Meliga, P., & Hachem, E. (2020). Optimization and passive flow control using single-step deep reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.02979. [15] Glezer, A., & Amitay, M. (2002). Synthetic Jets. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 34, 503-529. [16] Gössling, S., & Humpe, A. (2020). The global scale, distribution and growth of aviation: Implications for climate change. Global Environmental Change, 65, 102194. [17] Greenblatt, D., & Williams, D. R. (2022). Flow control for unmanned air vehicles. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 54(1), 383-412. [18] Greenblatt, D., & Wygnanski, I. J. (2000). The Control of Flow Separation by Periodic Excitation. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 36(7), 487-545. [19] Huang, L., Zhang, J., & Cui, Z. (2016). Review of Recent Developments in Flow Control for Civil Transport Aircraft. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 29(3), 382-396. [20] Jessam, R. A., & Hamdi, S. S. (2024, June). Drag reduction in pipelines flow using passive flow control. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 3002, No. 1). AIP Publishing. [21] Joslin, R. D. (1998). Overview of Laminar Flow Control. NASA Technical Memorandum 1998-208705. [22] Li, Y., Chang, J., Kong, C., & Bao, W. (2022). Recent progress of machine learning in flow modeling and active flow control. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 35(4), 14-44. [23] Mariaprakasam, R. D. R., Mat, S., Samin, P. M., Othman, N., Ab Wahid, M., & Said, M. (2023). Review on flow controls for vehicles aerodynamic drag reduction. Journal of Advanced Research in Fluid Mechanics and Thermal Sciences, 101(1), 11-36. [24] McLean, D. (2012). Understanding aerodynamics: arguing from the real physics. John Wiley & Sons. [25] Priyanka, K. S., Vihar, R. S., & Jeyan, M. L. (2024, April). Delaying the flow separation by using passage and vortex generator techniques. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 3037, No. 1). AIP Publishing. [26] Rashid, S., Nawaz, F., Maqsood, A., Salamat, S., & Riaz, R. (2022). Review of wave drag reduction techniques: Advances in active, passive, and hybrid flow control. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 236(14), 2851-2884. [27] Sharma, K., & Srinivas, G. (2020). Flying smart: Smart materials used in aviation industry. Materials Today: Proceedings, 27, 244-250. [28] Sundaram, P., Sengupta, S., Suman, V. K., Sengupta, T. K., Bhumkar, Y. G., & Mathpal, R. K. (2022). Flow control using single dielectric barrier discharge plasma actuator for flow over airfoil. Physics of Fluids, 34(9). [29] Sundharasan, R., Gowtham, G., Kumaran, T., & Elumalai, K. (2022). Aerodynamics enhancement using adaptive flow control. In Handbook of Research on Aspects and Applications of Incompressible and Compressible Aerodynamics (pp. 323-342). IGI Global. [30] Wilke, S. (1997). Hybrid Laminar Flow Control. Journal of Aircraft, 34(5), 727-730. [31] Xiu, Y., Geng, L., Hu, Z., & Wang, X. (2020, December). Research on an underwater fluidic thrust vectoring method based on an active flow control technique. In 2020 5th International Conference on Mechanical, Control and Computer Engineering (ICMCCE) (pp. 582-587).

Copyright

Copyright © 2025 Bishnujee Singh. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.